Farm Subsidy information
Ransom County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Ransom County, North Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 725
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Ransom County, North Dakota totaled $27,481,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Andy Sweet | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $59,511 |
62 | Bradley Keith Hoistad | Forman, ND 58032 | $59,397 |
63 | Lyle J Olson LLC | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $58,842 |
64 | Eugene Allen Birklid | Fort Ransom, ND 58033 | $57,219 |
65 | Steven Trautman | Enderlin, ND 58027 | $56,451 |
66 | Kent David Bartholomay | Enderlin, ND 58027 | $56,107 |
67 | Randall Greenley | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $54,412 |
68 | Casey Sweet | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $52,857 |
69 | Meyer Family Lllp | West Fargo, ND 58078 | $52,740 |
70 | R Lazy B Ranch Inc | Nome, ND 58062 | $51,386 |
71 | Gkl Farms Llp | Fargo, ND 58102 | $51,027 |
72 | John Carlblom | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $50,932 |
73 | Mhf Inc | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $50,820 |
74 | Holly Michelle Johnson | Litchville, ND 58461 | $50,710 |
75 | Timothy Marvin Johnson | Litchville, ND 58461 | $50,703 |
76 | Liberty Line Farm Inc | Enderlin, ND 58027 | $50,069 |
77 | Bruce Pantzke | Fort Ransom, ND 58033 | $50,000 |
78 | Sharie Wagner | Fort Ransom, ND 58033 | $49,611 |
79 | Duane Cole | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $48,998 |
80 | Matthew Jerome Olson | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $48,590 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”