Market Loss Assistance Program in Ransom County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 722
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Ransom County, North Dakota totaled $13,496,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Daniel & Matthew Bartholomay Jv | Sheldon, ND 58068 | $64,206 |
62 | Wallace James Carlson Jr | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $64,164 |
63 | Kevin Lee Schultz | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $63,657 |
64 | Larry Allan Schultz | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $63,655 |
65 | Eugene Krueger | Sheldon, ND 58068 | $63,377 |
66 | Donald Eugene Stansbery Jr | Sheldon, ND 58068 | $62,534 |
67 | Steven Marvin Reinke | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $61,538 |
68 | Michael Wayne Mairs | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $61,341 |
69 | Georgie Thompson | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $61,049 |
70 | Stephen Patrick Schultz | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $60,567 |
71 | Leo Aloysius Lyons | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $60,309 |
72 | Virgil Dagman | Enderlin, ND 58027 | $59,730 |
73 | Keith Arlen Cavett | Nome, ND 58062 | $58,919 |
74 | Ox Ranch Limited Partnership | Sheldon, ND 58068 | $58,749 |
75 | David John Rotenberger | Milnor, ND 58060 | $57,266 |
76 | Clair Melvin Storhaug | Breckenridge, MN 56520 | $55,740 |
77 | Lewis Albert Lyons | Enderlin, ND 58027 | $55,440 |
78 | Douglas Charles Rotenberger | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $55,096 |
79 | Terry Thompson | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $54,898 |
80 | Dennis Peterson | Milnor, ND 58060 | $54,243 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”