Farm Subsidy information
Ransom County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Ransom County, North Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 725
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Ransom County, North Dakota totaled $27,481,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Gaylen James Dick | Englevale, ND 58033 | $48,216 |
82 | Rotenberger Farms Inc | Milnor, ND 58060 | $47,565 |
83 | Virgil Dagman | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $46,918 |
84 | Gregory Scott Schwab | Englevale, ND 58033 | $46,474 |
85 | Daryl Keith Strander | Englevale, ND 58033 | $46,291 |
86 | Brayden Chad Wagner | Fort Ransom, ND 58033 | $46,041 |
87 | Mary Beth Wagner | Fort Ransom, ND 58033 | $46,041 |
88 | Mairs Family Trust | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $45,807 |
89 | Lyle Jerome Olson | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $45,640 |
90 | Michael Joseph Olson | Milnor, ND 58060 | $45,014 |
91 | Harvey Myles Hoenhause | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $44,956 |
92 | Scott Jeffrey Gilbert | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $44,949 |
93 | Jerome Herbert Freeberg | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $44,389 |
94 | Ben A Lambrecht | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $43,556 |
95 | Benjamin Peter Dick | Englevale, ND 58033 | $43,531 |
96 | Danny Wallace Galbreath | Enderlin, ND 58027 | $43,185 |
97 | Terry Thompson | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $41,929 |
98 | Gregory Paul Walton | Englevale, ND 58033 | $41,500 |
99 | Chad Ronald Wagner | Englevale, ND 58033 | $40,947 |
100 | Cynthia Nims | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $40,641 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”