Counter Cyclical Program in Ransom County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 514
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Ransom County, North Dakota totaled $4,384,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Keith & Pamela Hoistad Living Trust | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $12,805 |
102 | Pamela Kiefer Hoistad | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $12,802 |
103 | Myron Hammer | Kathryn, ND 58049 | $12,782 |
104 | Benjamin Dick Farms Inc | Englevale, ND 58033 | $12,261 |
105 | Rodger Douglas Olson | Leonard, ND 58052 | $12,242 |
106 | Charles James Faber | Milnor, ND 58060 | $12,189 |
107 | Roland K Reinke | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $11,835 |
108 | Jeffrey Richard Dick | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $11,481 |
109 | Ronald William Friese | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $11,284 |
110 | Lyons T R N Farms | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $11,241 |
111 | Richard Cavett | Enderlin, ND 58027 | $11,058 |
112 | Kenneth Johnson | Milnor, ND 58060 | $11,008 |
113 | Jack U Lambrecht | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $10,978 |
114 | Randy Scott Quam | Mcleod, ND 58057 | $10,889 |
115 | Robert Lynn Birklid | Nome, ND 58062 | $10,817 |
116 | Lynn Shelver | Enderlin, ND 58027 | $10,786 |
117 | Donald Miller | Enderlin, ND 58027 | $10,578 |
118 | Michael & William Lyons Jv | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $10,466 |
119 | Allen William Lambrecht | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $10,252 |
120 | Grant Sydney Beem | Milnor, ND 58060 | $10,225 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”