Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Ransom County, North Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 153
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Ransom County, North Dakota totaled $765,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | James A Sagvold | Sheldon, ND 58068 | $1,685 |
102 | Jason Berg | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $1,658 |
103 | J2k Land & Cattle | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $1,602 |
104 | Charles Leonard Thoreson | Fort Ransom, ND 58033 | $1,549 |
105 | Mitch Elijah | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $1,483 |
106 | Loren Leigh Larson | Litchville, ND 58461 | $1,482 |
107 | Kyle Bleecker | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $1,467 |
108 | Robbie Mairs | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $1,388 |
109 | Terry Kempel | Gwinner, ND 58040 | $1,312 |
110 | T & N Lyons Farms | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $1,305 |
111 | Ryan William Lyons | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $1,265 |
112 | Travis Lee Brandvold | Kathryn, ND 58049 | $1,187 |
113 | Lyle J Olson LLC | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $1,179 |
114 | Casey Jack Petersen | Ellendale, ND 58436 | $1,163 |
115 | Jerry Sorby | Fort Ransom, ND 58033 | $1,136 |
116 | Stacilyn M Erdmann | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $1,104 |
117 | Travis Adolfs | Fort Ransom, ND 58033 | $1,069 |
118 | Billie Jo Mcleod | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $1,061 |
119 | Kristofer Lee Karlgaard | Litchville, ND 58461 | $974 |
120 | Michael J Martin | Enderlin, ND 58027 | $968 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”