Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in Ransom County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 214
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in Ransom County, North Dakota totaled $11,292,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Rodney Jay Stram | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $3,936 |
162 | Wood Farm Partnership | Fargo, ND 58102 | $3,832 |
163 | James Robert Lukes | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $3,637 |
164 | Verne Charles Watts | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $3,635 |
165 | Joshua B Nims | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $3,421 |
166 | Ponderosa Angus Ranch | Kathryn, ND 58049 | $3,264 |
167 | Torey Kempel | Stirum, ND 58069 | $3,220 |
168 | Timothy Raymond Larson | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $3,086 |
169 | Steven Marvin Reinke | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $2,964 |
170 | Melford Rufsvold | Fort Ransom, ND 58033 | $2,761 |
171 | Eb Farms Inc | Milnor, ND 58060 | $2,704 |
172 | L7 Ranch Partnership | Leonard, ND 58052 | $2,660 |
173 | Uppland Sisters Llp | Leonard, ND 58052 | $2,341 |
174 | Chad Lambrecht | Englevale, ND 58033 | $2,264 |
175 | Stephan Orvin Hogness | Milnor, ND 58060 | $2,039 |
176 | Christopher Brummund | Edgeley, ND 58433 | $1,947 |
177 | Mark Patrick Bueling | West Fargo, ND 58078 | $1,907 |
178 | Alvin Evanson | Detroit Lakes, MN 56501 | $1,880 |
179 | Dustin E Lukes | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $1,827 |
180 | James Sorby | Fort Ransom, ND 58033 | $1,794 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”