Farm Subsidy information
Ransom County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Ransom County, North Dakota, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 638
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Ransom County, North Dakota totaled $28,689,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Richard Reinke | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $194,160 |
22 | Kenyon Sorby Inc | Fort Ransom, ND 58033 | $188,351 |
23 | M & J Olson Farms | Enderlin, ND 58027 | $180,043 |
24 | Myron Hammer | Kathryn, ND 58049 | $177,594 |
25 | Chs Capital LLC ** | Inver Grove Heights, MN 55077 | $172,493 |
26 | Steven James Olson | Enderlin, ND 58027 | $169,888 |
27 | Wallace James Carlson Jr | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $168,927 |
28 | Jerome Herbert Freeberg | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $146,128 |
29 | Eugene Allen Birklid | Fort Ransom, ND 58033 | $144,484 |
30 | Michael & William Lyons Jv | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $138,958 |
31 | Top Third Farms LLC | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $136,971 |
32 | Scott Mcdaniel Farms Inc | Englevale, ND 58033 | $135,492 |
33 | Cynthia Nims | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $128,041 |
34 | Wiltse Farm And Livestock | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $125,093 |
35 | Magill Farms Inc | Verona, ND 58490 | $123,474 |
36 | Kevin Lee Schultz | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $118,903 |
37 | Sjr Farm Partnership | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $117,018 |
38 | Kent David Bartholomay | Enderlin, ND 58027 | $116,199 |
39 | David Larson Farm Inc | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $113,543 |
40 | Thatcher Scott Peterson | Milnor, ND 58060 | $109,938 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”