Counter Cyclical Program in Richland County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 982
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Richland County, North Dakota totaled $13,023,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Ronald Richard Prochnow | Hankinson, ND 58041 | $49,839 |
62 | Gene August Wefel | Wahpeton, ND 58075 | $49,667 |
63 | Danny Dean Thompson | Wyndmere, ND 58081 | $49,582 |
64 | Mary Ellen Jones | Wyndmere, ND 58081 | $48,002 |
65 | Bruce John Sturgess | Hankinson, ND 58041 | $47,247 |
66 | Corey James Theede | Fairmount, ND 58030 | $47,139 |
67 | Jason Edward Theede | Fairmount, ND 58030 | $47,138 |
68 | Frank Steger | Wahpeton, ND 58075 | $46,729 |
69 | Mark Irvin Huseth | Mcleod, ND 58057 | $46,637 |
70 | Triple O Farms Ptr | Wahpeton, ND 58075 | $46,146 |
71 | Dean Wayne Swenson | Walcott, ND 58077 | $45,947 |
72 | Mitchel Dale Rhodenbaugh | Wyndmere, ND 58081 | $45,679 |
73 | Rlk Mauch Inc | Mooreton, ND 58061 | $45,354 |
74 | Km Farms Inc | Mooreton, ND 58061 | $45,304 |
75 | Melissa Amy Braaten | Kindred, ND 58051 | $45,149 |
76 | Mark David Gorder | Wahpeton, ND 58075 | $44,536 |
77 | Joel Peter Kaler | Lidgerwood, ND 58053 | $44,392 |
78 | Christopher Jon Mcdonald | Leonard, ND 58052 | $44,095 |
79 | Brian Roger Mcdonald | Leonard, ND 58052 | $44,095 |
80 | Michael Joseph Pikarski | Mooreton, ND 58061 | $43,979 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”