Loan Deficiency in Richland County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 1,256
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Richland County, North Dakota totaled $74,278,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Willard Eric Onchuck | Wahpeton, ND 58075 | $249,471 |
62 | Karm Co | Mooreton, ND 58061 | $242,929 |
63 | Michael Joseph Pikarski | Mooreton, ND 58061 | $240,244 |
64 | Eldon Clarence Hermunslie | Wahpeton, ND 58075 | $239,622 |
65 | Kenneth Allen Lyons | Lidgerwood, ND 58053 | $239,533 |
66 | Brenda Lynn Prochnow | Wahpeton, ND 58075 | $235,343 |
67 | Kurt Karl Anderson | Colfax, ND 58018 | $232,984 |
68 | James Allen Griffith | Colfax, ND 58018 | $232,598 |
69 | Wayne Heley | Lidgerwood, ND 58053 | $232,506 |
70 | Kent Darrel Quamme | Wahpeton, ND 58075 | $231,895 |
71 | Clarence Kevin Kutzer | Fairmount, ND 58030 | $230,035 |
72 | Gordon George Olson | Colfax, ND 58018 | $225,748 |
73 | Rodney Dale Kluge | Hankinson, ND 58041 | $225,212 |
74 | Dennis James Mauch | Mantador, ND 58058 | $224,537 |
75 | Ktm Farm | Wahpeton, ND 58075 | $223,681 |
76 | James Dean Vellenga | Hankinson, ND 58041 | $221,039 |
77 | Jolene-kelly Miller Jv | Wahpeton, ND 58075 | $220,146 |
78 | Thomas Gerard Schiltz | Hankinson, ND 58041 | $219,473 |
79 | James Wulfekuhle | Wahpeton, ND 58075 | $214,409 |
80 | Russell Casper Mauch | Barney, ND 58008 | $213,200 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”