Counter Cyclical Program in Richland County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 982
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Richland County, North Dakota totaled $13,023,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Jeffrey Arnold Mauch | Mooreton, ND 58061 | $26,320 |
162 | J & K Grain Farms | Mooreton, ND 58061 | $26,222 |
163 | Robert Anthony Matejcek | Wahpeton, ND 58075 | $26,093 |
164 | Mark Steven Matejcek | Wahpeton, ND 58074 | $26,087 |
165 | Arnold Morris Woodbury | Wyndmere, ND 58081 | $25,980 |
166 | Marvin Lugert Farms Inc | Wyndmere, ND 58081 | $25,950 |
167 | Clifford Wade Krause | Hankinson, ND 58041 | $25,792 |
168 | Johnson Farms | Walcott, ND 58077 | $25,513 |
169 | Wayne Heley | Lidgerwood, ND 58053 | $25,393 |
170 | Steven Robert Breuer | Wahpeton, ND 58075 | $25,188 |
171 | Theodore Warren Luick | Fairmount, ND 58030 | $24,854 |
172 | Gordon Barry Luick | Fairmount, ND 58030 | $24,440 |
173 | Anthony William Luick | Fairmount, ND 58030 | $24,440 |
174 | David Louis Hager | Barney, ND 58008 | $24,414 |
175 | Chris S Walberg | Leonard, ND 58052 | $24,376 |
176 | Rockey D Stoltenow | Wahpeton, ND 58075 | $24,365 |
177 | David Milo Olson | Wyndmere, ND 58081 | $24,138 |
178 | David Lynn Tiegs | Hankinson, ND 58041 | $23,977 |
179 | Paul Armand Tiegs | Hankinson, ND 58041 | $23,977 |
180 | James Donald Moffet | Barney, ND 58008 | $23,971 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”