Conservation Reserve Program in Rolette County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 872
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Rolette County, North Dakota totaled $49,237,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | James Schmaltz | Barton, ND 58384 | $102,450 |
142 | Fred Cilz Est | Rugby, ND 58368 | $101,314 |
143 | William Smith Est | Cottage Grove, MN 55016 | $99,890 |
144 | Larry D Armstrong | Minot, ND 58702 | $98,455 |
145 | Ashley Johnson | Rolette, ND 58366 | $97,195 |
146 | Ernest Slaubaugh | Sarasota, FL 34232 | $96,727 |
147 | Boucher Family Trust | Hilbert, WI 54129 | $96,306 |
148 | Gary Hill | Rolette, ND 58366 | $95,792 |
149 | Kenneth Casavant | Pullman, WA 99163 | $95,712 |
150 | Robert Rocheleau Est | Rolette, ND 58366 | $95,392 |
151 | Mildred Parrill | Bottineau, ND 58318 | $94,783 |
152 | Nancy Krekorian | Grass Valley, CA 95949 | $93,617 |
153 | Carol Carbonneau | Bottineau, ND 58318 | $93,591 |
154 | Fred Neameyer Est | Dunseith, ND 58329 | $93,480 |
155 | Adam A Lang | Auke Bay, AK 99821 | $93,128 |
156 | Don R Kotschevar | Mullan, ID 83846 | $93,101 |
157 | Emily Boucher | La Grande, OR 97850 | $93,006 |
158 | Maxine Dissette | Rolette, ND 58366 | $92,486 |
159 | David Hill | Willow City, ND 58384 | $91,730 |
160 | Kenneth Ostreim Est | Rolette, ND 58366 | $91,245 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”