Farm Subsidy information
Rolette County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Rolette County, North Dakota, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 588
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Rolette County, North Dakota totaled $19,524,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Meghan M Grenier | Rolette, ND 58366 | $128,195 |
22 | Jennifer Pederson | Rolette, ND 58366 | $119,651 |
23 | Steven Alan Neameyer | Mylo, ND 58353 | $119,346 |
24 | Curtis Allan Haman | Dunseith, ND 58329 | $118,578 |
25 | Bradley Allan Disrud | Rolla, ND 58367 | $117,148 |
26 | Lisa Neameyer | Rolla, ND 58367 | $116,307 |
27 | Michael Alfred Mongeon | Rolette, ND 58366 | $116,114 |
28 | Mark Martinson | Rolette, ND 58366 | $112,429 |
29 | Dwayne F Brossart | Willow City, ND 58384 | $111,945 |
30 | Gary Spencer Molitor | Bisbee, ND 58317 | $110,391 |
31 | Brent Allan Bonn | Mylo, ND 58353 | $110,270 |
32 | Margaret Pederson | Rolette, ND 58366 | $108,580 |
33 | Danny Howard Foss | Rolette, ND 58366 | $107,436 |
34 | Daniel K Armstrong | Rolette, ND 58366 | $101,917 |
35 | Tony Good | Rolla, ND 58367 | $99,436 |
36 | Michael Robert Demers | Saint John, ND 58369 | $94,462 |
37 | Curtis James Richard | Rolette, ND 58366 | $92,074 |
38 | Gary Lynn Haman | Rolette, ND 58366 | $91,158 |
39 | David Hill | Willow City, ND 58384 | $89,390 |
40 | Gary Hill | Rolette, ND 58366 | $89,326 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”