Counter Cyclical Program in Sargent County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 532
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Sargent County, North Dakota totaled $5,081,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Loren Hans Hanson | Forman, ND 58032 | $25,726 |
62 | Alan Herman Malpert | Cogswell, ND 58017 | $23,098 |
63 | Joseph Clarence Breker | Havana, ND 58043 | $22,946 |
64 | William John Woytassek | Detroit Lakes, MN 56501 | $22,592 |
65 | Gerald William Woytassek | Milnor, ND 58060 | $22,592 |
66 | Oak View Farms Inc | Oakes, ND 58474 | $22,255 |
67 | Kevin Carl Carlson | Oakes, ND 58474 | $22,100 |
68 | Martinson Bros Jv | Milnor, ND 58060 | $22,020 |
69 | Jeffrey Dean Breker | Havana, ND 58043 | $21,972 |
70 | Daryl Frederick Foertsch | Lidgerwood, ND 58053 | $21,590 |
71 | Jason Quandt | Oakes, ND 58474 | $21,480 |
72 | Lenny Pherson | Rutland, ND 58067 | $21,325 |
73 | Jason J Bosse | Cogswell, ND 58017 | $21,293 |
74 | Roger Irvin Nelson | Rutland, ND 58067 | $20,765 |
75 | William Joseph Hayen | Cogswell, ND 58017 | $20,361 |
76 | Marshall Wallace Lien | Milnor, ND 58060 | $19,823 |
77 | Richard William Banish | Cayuga, ND 58013 | $19,713 |
78 | Michael Peter Banish | Rutland, ND 58067 | $19,713 |
79 | Daniel Leroy Bishoff | Cogswell, ND 58017 | $19,648 |
80 | Dennis Duane Werre | Fullerton, ND 58441 | $19,463 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”