Counter Cyclical Program in Sargent County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 532
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Sargent County, North Dakota totaled $5,081,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Lyle Erickson | Rutland, ND 58067 | $12,174 |
122 | Donald Colby | Milnor, ND 58060 | $12,140 |
123 | Kim Frederick Rasmussen | Forman, ND 58032 | $12,117 |
124 | Sandra Kay Rasmussen | Forman, ND 58032 | $12,115 |
125 | Jack L Swearingen | Crete, ND 58040 | $11,910 |
126 | Gary Allan Lien | Milnor, ND 58060 | $11,870 |
127 | Joel Helmer Halvorson | Milnor, ND 58060 | $11,851 |
128 | John F Zetocha | Oakes, ND 58474 | $11,648 |
129 | Fridtjov Bakk Trust | Fargo, ND 58107 | $11,211 |
130 | Harris Grain Co Inc | Oakes, ND 58474 | $11,132 |
131 | David Allan Seibel | Britton, SD 57430 | $10,874 |
132 | Raymond Harris Martinson | Milnor, ND 58060 | $10,853 |
133 | R Farm Inc | Oakes, ND 58474 | $10,789 |
134 | Paul Dennis Roney | Oakes, ND 58474 | $10,507 |
135 | Bernard Planteen | Cogswell, ND 58017 | $10,439 |
136 | Daniel Ernest Pearson | Forman, ND 58032 | $10,218 |
137 | Gary J Anderson | Cayuga, ND 58013 | $10,091 |
138 | Todd Glen Thompson | Cogswell, ND 58017 | $10,047 |
139 | Jesse Dean Arth | Milnor, ND 58060 | $10,007 |
140 | Douglas Scott Glarum | Rutland, ND 58067 | $9,863 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”