Farm Subsidy information
Sargent County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Sargent County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 2,060
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Sargent County, North Dakota totaled $649,329,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Roger Gibbon | Milnor, ND 58060 | $809,792 |
142 | Shannon Michael Bergh | Oak Point, TX 75068 | $808,656 |
143 | Stephen John Nicolai | Milnor, ND 58060 | $808,582 |
144 | Joel Thomas Anderson | Forman, ND 58032 | $804,993 |
145 | Harold P Lawrence | Geneseo, ND 58053 | $803,854 |
146 | Cheryl Lee Zirnhelt | Forman, ND 58032 | $797,021 |
147 | Betty Rust | Cogswell, ND 58017 | $790,192 |
148 | Richard Harold Ruch | Cogswell, ND 58017 | $788,648 |
149 | David John Lunneborg | Cayuga, ND 58013 | $782,629 |
150 | Ryan Hans Hanson | Forman, ND 58032 | $781,320 |
151 | William J Nathe | Milnor, ND 58060 | $781,158 |
152 | Beaver Farms Inc | Stirum, ND 58069 | $779,046 |
153 | Cole Brian Vculek | Crete, ND 58040 | $778,742 |
154 | Thane Alan Bergh | Havana, ND 58043 | $775,014 |
155 | Roger Paul White | Stirum, ND 58069 | $772,635 |
156 | Andrew John Woytassek | Rutland, ND 58067 | $771,024 |
157 | Stenvold Family Farm Trust | Forman, ND 58032 | $770,538 |
158 | Philip Paul Roney | Oakes, ND 58474 | $770,095 |
159 | Harvey Melvin Bergstrom | Cayuga, ND 58013 | $767,813 |
160 | Lenny Pherson | Rutland, ND 58067 | $761,966 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”