Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Sargent County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 400
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Sargent County, North Dakota totaled $13,326,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Louis G Gaukler | Cayuga, ND 58013 | $24,937 |
162 | Ryan J Lindvall | Cogswell, ND 58017 | $24,709 |
163 | James Richard Woytassek | Lidgerwood, ND 58053 | $24,690 |
164 | David Hassebroek | Cogswell, ND 58017 | $24,473 |
165 | Kyle Marquette | Rutland, ND 58067 | $24,068 |
166 | Mark Charles Gainor | Milnor, ND 58060 | $23,971 |
167 | Timothy Rehborg | Gwinner, ND 58040 | $23,309 |
168 | Mathias Zastrow | Hecla, SD 57446 | $23,240 |
169 | Jon Charles Anderson | Britton, SD 57430 | $23,233 |
170 | Harlan Hogness | Milnor, ND 58060 | $23,187 |
171 | Jason Bosse Farms Inc | Cogswell, ND 58017 | $23,082 |
172 | Steven Roger Bopp | Stirum, ND 58069 | $23,036 |
173 | Scott Bopp | Stirum, ND 58069 | $23,036 |
174 | Joel Helmer Halvorson | Milnor, ND 58060 | $22,835 |
175 | Mark William Reisenweber | Forman, ND 58032 | $22,814 |
176 | James Martinson | Milnor, ND 58060 | $22,383 |
177 | Mitchell Herman | Veblen, SD 57270 | $22,068 |
178 | , | $22,040 | |
179 | Ben Reisenweber | Havana, ND 58043 | $21,990 |
180 | Scott Allen Stroh | Mcclusky, ND 58463 | $21,770 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”