Total Disaster Programs in Sheridan County, North Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 292
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Sheridan County, North Dakota totaled $18,301,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Kelly James Nitz | Harvey, ND 58341 | $215,354 |
22 | Ryan Gregory Felchle | Denhoff, ND 58430 | $197,635 |
23 | Curtis Dean Hase | Anamoose, ND 58710 | $184,708 |
24 | Owen Mccormick Fiedler | Butte, ND 58723 | $178,756 |
25 | Rex Ryan Hollenbeck | Mcclusky, ND 58463 | $177,169 |
26 | Dean A Ripplinger | Mcclusky, ND 58463 | $174,034 |
27 | Fredrick Duane Hase | Martin, ND 58758 | $172,770 |
28 | Myron Henry Dieterle | Kief, ND 58723 | $169,126 |
29 | Clyde D Reimche | Martin, ND 58758 | $166,730 |
30 | L C Ranch Inc | Mercer, ND 58559 | $166,210 |
31 | David Allen Demke | Goodrich, ND 58444 | $165,698 |
32 | Westen K Feickert | Martin, ND 58758 | $160,209 |
33 | Hugh S Raugust | Harvey, ND 58341 | $159,563 |
34 | Kendon M Faul | Mcclusky, ND 58463 | $158,939 |
35 | Craig Allen Peerboom | Goodrich, ND 58444 | $153,705 |
36 | Clifton Scott Dockter | Denhoff, ND 58430 | $148,508 |
37 | Alex D Ripplinger | Mcclusky, ND 58463 | $147,008 |
38 | Arvilla Arliss Peerboom | Goodrich, ND 58444 | $144,254 |
39 | Barbara Ann Peerboom | Goodrich, ND 58444 | $144,159 |
40 | Jordan K Miller | Denhoff, ND 58430 | $142,157 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”