Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Sheridan County, North Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 181
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Sheridan County, North Dakota totaled $1,474,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Leslie Wall | Mercer, ND 58559 | $17,147 |
22 | Reimche Land And Cattle Inc | Martin, ND 58758 | $16,871 |
23 | Darrell Robert Grade | Kief, ND 58723 | $16,215 |
24 | Lyle Leslie Brewster | Mercer, ND 58559 | $16,163 |
25 | L C Ranch Inc | Mercer, ND 58559 | $15,953 |
26 | John Halcrow | Mcclusky, ND 58463 | $15,926 |
27 | Ryley Alan Elston | Sanborn, ND 58480 | $15,433 |
28 | Brian E Goven | Mercer, ND 58559 | $15,204 |
29 | Roger Strobel | Denhoff, ND 58430 | $14,036 |
30 | Jasen Reiser | Turtle Lake, ND 58575 | $13,721 |
31 | Derek Ebach | Mcclusky, ND 58463 | $12,896 |
32 | Matthew L Kline | Hurdsfield, ND 58451 | $12,690 |
33 | Dennis Duane Bertsch | Mcclusky, ND 58463 | $12,589 |
34 | Aaron Hertz | Wing, ND 58494 | $11,944 |
35 | Albert Krueger | Harvey, ND 58341 | $11,925 |
36 | Myron Henry Dieterle | Kief, ND 58723 | $11,678 |
37 | Delton Hochhalter | Regan, ND 58477 | $11,549 |
38 | Arnold Wall | Mercer, ND 58559 | $11,535 |
39 | Lynn Vietz | Bismarck, ND 58501 | $11,428 |
40 | Norman Otto Boehm | Mcclusky, ND 58463 | $11,329 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”