Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Sheridan County, North Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 319
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Sheridan County, North Dakota totaled $2,539,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Barbara Ann Peerboom | Goodrich, ND 58444 | $31,696 |
22 | Damon J Tessmann | Goodrich, ND 58444 | $29,419 |
23 | James Mark Pellman | Mcclusky, ND 58463 | $28,395 |
24 | Troy Henry Stein | Mcclusky, ND 58463 | $27,856 |
25 | Christopher H Stein | Mcclusky, ND 58463 | $27,856 |
26 | Levi Ron Boehm | Mcclusky, ND 58463 | $25,684 |
27 | Jason Ronald Isaak | Anamoose, ND 58710 | $25,068 |
28 | Myron Henry Dieterle | Kief, ND 58723 | $25,039 |
29 | Choice Financial Group ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $24,807 |
30 | Ryan Gregory Felchle | Denhoff, ND 58430 | $24,760 |
31 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $24,671 |
32 | Dean A Ripplinger | Mcclusky, ND 58463 | $22,062 |
33 | Reimche Land And Cattle Inc | Martin, ND 58758 | $21,378 |
34 | Curtis Dean Hase | Anamoose, ND 58710 | $21,199 |
35 | Kelly S Feickert | Martin, ND 58758 | $20,397 |
36 | Mary J Feickert | Martin, ND 58758 | $20,397 |
37 | Kelly James Nitz | Harvey, ND 58341 | $20,141 |
38 | Douglas A Martin | Rugby, ND 58368 | $19,848 |
39 | Dean Eric Weltz | Anamoose, ND 58710 | $19,766 |
40 | Mark Alan Abrahamson | Mcclusky, ND 58463 | $19,077 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”