Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Sheridan County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 501
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Sheridan County, North Dakota totaled $14,210,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Bank Forward ** | Cooperstown, ND 58425 | $61,413 |
82 | Rodney Buxa | Anamoose, ND 58710 | $60,957 |
83 | John Pister | Kief, ND 58723 | $60,868 |
84 | John Walter Volochenko | Kief, ND 58723 | $60,407 |
85 | L C Ranch Inc | Mercer, ND 58559 | $59,252 |
86 | Dallas Duane Pfennig | Mcclusky, ND 58463 | $59,244 |
87 | Levi Ron Boehm | Mcclusky, ND 58463 | $58,694 |
88 | Ronald Aaron Novak | Minot, ND 58701 | $57,592 |
89 | David Allen Martin | Kief, ND 58723 | $56,973 |
90 | David Allen Demke | Goodrich, ND 58444 | $55,914 |
91 | Todd James Mckinven | Martin, ND 58758 | $55,619 |
92 | Clifton Cleo Dockter | Denhoff, ND 58430 | $55,135 |
93 | Virgil S Laib | Mcclusky, ND 58463 | $54,752 |
94 | Sheila Rae Stein | Mcclusky, ND 58463 | $52,473 |
95 | Bertch Farms Inc | Bismarck, ND 58503 | $52,007 |
96 | Nathan Bonnet | Goodrich, ND 58444 | $50,637 |
97 | Mark Timothy Engen | Anamoose, ND 58710 | $50,458 |
98 | Keith D Christensen | Kief, ND 58723 | $49,158 |
99 | Rauser Family Inc | Goodrich, ND 58444 | $48,444 |
100 | Alex D Ripplinger | Mcclusky, ND 58463 | $47,172 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”