SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program in Sheridan County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 139
Recipients of SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program from farms in Sheridan County, North Dakota totaled $3,061,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Jamie A Myers | Minot, ND 58701 | $4,354 |
102 | George And Al-rita Meyer Family T | Lompoc, CA 93436 | $4,033 |
103 | Wesley Ray Pepple | Kief, ND 58747 | $3,866 |
104 | Wesley Duane Stein | Mcclusky, ND 58463 | $3,773 |
105 | Keith Lakeman | Blaine, MN 55449 | $3,464 |
106 | Dean D Hieb | Steele, ND 58482 | $3,443 |
107 | Wesley Dale Grade | Kief, ND 58723 | $3,422 |
108 | David Allen Martin | Kief, ND 58723 | $3,337 |
109 | Glenn Lawrence Frey | Harvey, ND 58341 | $2,960 |
110 | Clay Donald Hollenbeck | Driscoll, ND 58532 | $2,954 |
111 | Jack H Kost | Martin, ND 58758 | $2,749 |
112 | Todd Gaylin Lasher | Mcclusky, ND 58463 | $2,720 |
113 | Ryan Lee Filler | Goodrich, ND 58444 | $2,627 |
114 | Steven James Haux | Mcclusky, ND 58463 | $2,500 |
115 | Kenneth Calvin Rath | Anamoose, ND 58710 | $2,361 |
116 | Gerald Wayne Rath | Anamoose, ND 58710 | $2,361 |
117 | Harlo Durand Triebwasser | Mcclusky, ND 58463 | $2,052 |
118 | Henry R Schuh | Anamoose, ND 58710 | $2,002 |
119 | Lawrence Schmeets | Harvey, ND 58341 | $1,709 |
120 | Robert J Spencer | Piscataway, NJ 08854 | $1,708 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”