Market Gains in Sheridan County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 118
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Sheridan County, North Dakota totaled $354,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Duwayne Ronald Tessmann | Bismarck, ND 58501 | $5,005 |
22 | Troy Henry Stein | Mcclusky, ND 58463 | $4,293 |
23 | Darin Gene Frueh | Goodrich, ND 58444 | $4,260 |
24 | Gerald Thomas Peerboom | Goodrich, ND 58444 | $4,202 |
25 | Arvilla Arliss Peerboom | Goodrich, ND 58444 | $4,202 |
26 | Lawrence Kelvin Bartz | Anamoose, ND 58710 | $4,149 |
27 | Kim Dale Erdmann | Goodrich, ND 58444 | $4,148 |
28 | Harold Herbert Frueh | Harvey, ND 58341 | $4,038 |
29 | Darrell Duane Fiesel | Harvey, ND 58341 | $3,908 |
30 | Mark Timothy Engen | Anamoose, ND 58710 | $3,877 |
31 | Tomm Jeffrey Bartz | Anamoose, ND 58710 | $3,741 |
32 | Terry Lee Schindler | Mcclusky, ND 58463 | $3,665 |
33 | Jeffrey Mark Engel | Kief, ND 58723 | $3,387 |
34 | Albert Krueger | Harvey, ND 58341 | $3,283 |
35 | Lee Edward Boehm | Mcclusky, ND 58463 | $3,036 |
36 | Jerry J Heil | Bismarck, ND 58503 | $3,033 |
37 | Barbara Ann Peerboom | Goodrich, ND 58444 | $2,990 |
38 | Lawrence Lautt | Harvey, ND 58341 | $2,800 |
39 | Eddy Boehm | Mcclusky, ND 58463 | $2,531 |
40 | Timothy Elvin Hase | Martin, ND 58758 | $2,518 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”