Farm Subsidy information
Sioux County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Sioux County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 773
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Sioux County, North Dakota totaled $127,660,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Courtney L Meyer | Solen, ND 58570 | $430,814 |
62 | James Pete Bertch | Bismarck, ND 58503 | $430,173 |
63 | Bertch Farms Inc | Bismarck, ND 58503 | $426,802 |
64 | Srst Rock Creek District | Bullhead, SD 57621 | $420,712 |
65 | Renei D Jochim | Selfridge, ND 58568 | $414,844 |
66 | Dale Boeckel | Beulah, ND 58523 | $400,861 |
67 | Nick N Nehl | Watauga, SD 57660 | $399,872 |
68 | Andrew Sandland | Mc Laughlin, SD 57642 | $398,632 |
69 | Albert R Two Bears | Cannon Ball, ND 58528 | $396,830 |
70 | Frank Tomac | Watauga, SD 57660 | $388,027 |
71 | Michael J Mathern | Solen, ND 58570 | $387,868 |
72 | David A Meyer | Flasher, ND 58535 | $377,576 |
73 | Jeremy Maher | Morristown, SD 57645 | $375,893 |
74 | Kurt Dale Hellman | Solen, ND 58570 | $365,643 |
75 | Richard A Hach | Mc Laughlin, SD 57642 | $352,021 |
76 | Ronald C Brownotter | Timber Lake, SD 57656 | $345,880 |
77 | Ronald Gross | Selfridge, ND 58568 | $344,663 |
78 | Wade Sandland | Mobridge, SD 57601 | $343,073 |
79 | Brad Olson | Mc Intosh, SD 57641 | $340,190 |
80 | Brenda K Meyer | Flasher, ND 58535 | $336,969 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”