Conservation Reserve Program in Sioux County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 199
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Sioux County, North Dakota totaled $6,806,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | William Main | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $8,086 |
122 | Diamond V Ranch | Selfridge, ND 58568 | $7,975 |
123 | Marcella F. Yellow Hammer | Fort Yates, ND 58538 | $7,773 |
124 | Standing Rock Farms | Fort Yates, ND 58538 | $7,767 |
125 | Jolee A Mosset | Fargo, ND 58103 | $7,665 |
126 | Jolee Ann Mosset | Fargo, ND 58103 | $7,660 |
127 | Jay Gullickson | Cannon Ball, ND 58528 | $7,544 |
128 | Jayne Corlene Laintz | Bismarck, ND 58504 | $7,540 |
129 | Evert O Johnson Estate | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $7,318 |
130 | Tess J Starr | Geddes, SD 57342 | $7,028 |
131 | Agnes M Wingerter | Mandan, ND 58554 | $7,024 |
132 | Richard Goodmanson | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $6,879 |
133 | Cody Varilek | Goodyear, AZ 85338 | $6,820 |
134 | Tara Varilek | Geddes, SD 57342 | $6,820 |
135 | Rolland Peterson | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $6,421 |
136 | Joseph Q Wingerter | Mandan, ND 58554 | $6,365 |
137 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $6,324 |
138 | Paul William Thomas | Cannon Ball, ND 58528 | $6,268 |
139 | Chaske Wicks Estate | Cannon Ball, ND 58528 | $6,091 |
140 | Mabel E Morgan | Redfield, SD 57469 | $6,033 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”