Total Commodity Programs in Sioux County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 181 to 200 of 604
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Sioux County, North Dakota totaled $37,602,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
181 | Lance Froelich | Selfridge, ND 58568 | $36,248 |
182 | Richard J Ressler Jr | Fort Rice, ND 58554 | $36,135 |
183 | Tyler Donald Polensky | Flasher, ND 58535 | $35,980 |
184 | Muggli Farms Inc | Fullerton, ND 58441 | $35,773 |
185 | Grant County State Bank ** | Carson, ND 58529 | $35,624 |
186 | Dorothy Johnson | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $35,411 |
187 | Heidi Louise Braaten | Oxbow, ND 58047 | $35,296 |
188 | Wyatt H Mollman | Morristown, SD 57645 | $35,128 |
189 | John Hilsendager Jr | Morristown, SD 57645 | $34,857 |
190 | Kdh Farms LLC | Sioux Falls, SD 57104 | $34,641 |
191 | Wayne Sandland | Mc Laughlin, SD 57642 | $34,003 |
192 | Vincent V Muggli | Fargo, ND 58102 | $33,871 |
193 | Leo Muggli Estate | Fargo, ND 58102 | $33,871 |
194 | Jasper Mel Wipf | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $33,867 |
195 | Raedell Braaten | Oxbow, ND 58047 | $33,443 |
196 | Michael Labrensz Estate | Mc Laughlin, SD 57642 | $33,442 |
197 | Dustin D Kraft | Selfridge, ND 58568 | $33,008 |
198 | Corbin L Johnson | Yuma, AZ 85367 | $32,880 |
199 | Michael J Murphy | Selfridge, ND 58568 | $32,569 |
200 | Philip Schaf | Solen, ND 58570 | $31,897 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”