Counter Cyclical Program in Sioux County, North Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 151
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Sioux County, North Dakota totaled $266,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Philip Schaf | Solen, ND 58570 | $2,887 |
22 | David Tenbroek | Mc Intosh, SD 57641 | $2,784 |
23 | Porcupine Local District | Selfridge, ND 58568 | $2,644 |
24 | Paul William Thomas | Cannon Ball, ND 58528 | $2,632 |
25 | Scott Allen Muggli | Fullerton, ND 58441 | $2,416 |
26 | Jeffery Glenn Ellison | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $2,375 |
27 | Michael J Mathern | Solen, ND 58570 | $2,339 |
28 | Quenton Heid | Selfridge, ND 58568 | $2,315 |
29 | Vivian Heid | Selfridge, ND 58568 | $2,314 |
30 | Lawrence Hoff | Flasher, ND 58535 | $2,181 |
31 | Daniel Maher | Morristown, SD 57645 | $2,041 |
32 | Jerome Bruggman | Fort Yates, ND 58538 | $1,795 |
33 | Dorothy Johnson | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $1,662 |
34 | Andrew Sandland | Mc Laughlin, SD 57642 | $1,590 |
35 | Casey Maher | Morristown, SD 57645 | $1,540 |
36 | Brian George | Solen, ND 58570 | $1,516 |
37 | Lujuanna George | Solen, ND 58570 | $1,516 |
38 | John Bruggman | Fort Yates, ND 58538 | $1,488 |
39 | Edward Anthony Maher | Morristown, SD 57645 | $1,350 |
40 | Duane Kraft | Selfridge, ND 58568 | $1,340 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”