Conservation Reserve Program in Sioux County, North Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 191
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Sioux County, North Dakota totaled $6,527,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Theresa Mosset | Bismarck, ND 58504 | $82,670 |
22 | J & M Cedar Revocable Living Trus | New Leipzig, ND 58562 | $81,392 |
23 | Zaczkowski Land Partnership Llp | Saint Cloud, MN 56301 | $78,594 |
24 | Ronald Hettich | Mc Laughlin, SD 57642 | $77,077 |
25 | Djh Incorporated | Fort Yates, ND 58538 | $74,322 |
26 | Beef Incorporated | Fort Yates, ND 58538 | $74,320 |
27 | Ronald C Brownotter | Timber Lake, SD 57656 | $70,554 |
28 | Nicholas A Vollmuth | Selfridge, ND 58568 | $67,328 |
29 | Bert Volk | Selfridge, ND 58568 | $63,558 |
30 | Gary Pudwill | Prior Lake, MN 55372 | $62,743 |
31 | Cheryl L. Bailey | Bismarck, ND 58504 | $61,292 |
32 | Jeffery Glenn Ellison | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $57,463 |
33 | Dennis Heinen | Bismarck, ND 58501 | $56,728 |
34 | Wingerter Revocable Trust | Bismarck, ND 58501 | $54,588 |
35 | E Tom Varilek | Geddes, SD 57342 | $53,214 |
36 | Brandon L Volk | Selfridge, ND 58568 | $52,807 |
37 | Standing Rock Sioux Tribe | Fort Yates, ND 58538 | $52,782 |
38 | Daniel Maher | Morristown, SD 57645 | $51,926 |
39 | Raymond A Kraft Trust | Mandan, ND 58554 | $51,562 |
40 | Donald W Schaeffer Estate | Mc Laughlin, SD 57642 | $48,919 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”