Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Slope County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 158
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Slope County, North Dakota totaled $8,555,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Jeff Powell | Amidon, ND 58620 | $135,637 |
22 | Dean Allan Wandler | New England, ND 58647 | $129,620 |
23 | Leslie Ann Wandler | New England, ND 58647 | $129,620 |
24 | Wade Alan Bock | New England, ND 58647 | $117,672 |
25 | Renee Ann Brown | Scranton, ND 58653 | $116,780 |
26 | Janet Ann Ehlis | Bismarck, ND 58504 | $112,422 |
27 | Ronald James Ehlis | Bismarck, ND 58504 | $112,416 |
28 | Kenneth Urlacher | New England, ND 58647 | $111,681 |
29 | Michael Olson | New England, ND 58647 | $110,906 |
30 | Mary Dennis | Bismarck, ND 58503 | $103,064 |
31 | Faye Ruggles | New England, ND 58647 | $102,732 |
32 | Sam Juntunen | Amidon, ND 58620 | $101,250 |
33 | Gary Van Daele | Rhame, ND 58651 | $92,332 |
34 | Ryan Stroh | Bowman, ND 58623 | $91,853 |
35 | Pat Ruggles | New England, ND 58647 | $89,332 |
36 | Chad Erickson | New England, ND 58647 | $81,215 |
37 | Kimberly Jean Ruggles | New England, ND 58647 | $79,476 |
38 | Clayton Phillip Martian | Bowman, ND 58623 | $78,014 |
39 | Kevin Jon Thompson | Bowman, ND 58623 | $74,416 |
40 | Kory Ruggles | New England, ND 58647 | $69,110 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”