Farm Subsidy information
Slope County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Slope County, North Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 259
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Slope County, North Dakota totaled $21,638,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Eric Carter Ehlis | Dickinson, ND 58601 | $173,854 |
22 | Elliott Warren Ehlis | New England, ND 58647 | $173,854 |
23 | Dan Jason Ehlis | Dickinson, ND 58601 | $173,854 |
24 | Michael Olson | New England, ND 58647 | $173,199 |
25 | Mary Dennis | Bismarck, ND 58503 | $171,158 |
26 | Chad Erickson | New England, ND 58647 | $167,382 |
27 | William Scott Gussey | New England, ND 58647 | $161,820 |
28 | Susan Elizabeth Powell | Bowman, ND 58623 | $152,033 |
29 | Kevin Jon Thompson | Bowman, ND 58623 | $151,969 |
30 | Kenneth Urlacher | New England, ND 58647 | $150,389 |
31 | Dan Powell | Bowman, ND 58623 | $148,522 |
32 | Leslie Ann Wandler | New England, ND 58647 | $148,317 |
33 | Gary Van Daele | Rhame, ND 58651 | $141,807 |
34 | Susann Powell | Amidon, ND 58620 | $139,331 |
35 | Jeff Powell | Amidon, ND 58620 | $137,660 |
36 | L Double Bar Ranch | Amidon, ND 58620 | $137,184 |
37 | Janet Ann Ehlis | Bismarck, ND 58504 | $126,062 |
38 | , | $119,551 | |
39 | Wade Alan Bock | New England, ND 58647 | $118,581 |
40 | Cody David Ruggles | New England, ND 58647 | $115,902 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”