Farm Subsidy information
Slope County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Slope County, North Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 203
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Slope County, North Dakota totaled $10,203,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Susan Elizabeth Powell | Bowman, ND 58623 | $32,666 |
22 | Ryan Jacobson | Rhame, ND 58651 | $32,036 |
23 | Rob Timm | Rhame, ND 58651 | $31,543 |
24 | Shaun Louis Bergquist | Rhame, ND 58651 | $27,753 |
25 | Wanda Powell | Bowman, ND 58623 | $27,156 |
26 | Frank Buzalsky | Amidon, ND 58620 | $26,959 |
27 | Donald Heinrich | Rhame, ND 58651 | $25,935 |
28 | Donald T Burke | Bowman, ND 58623 | $25,905 |
29 | Stonie Hewson | New England, ND 58647 | $25,591 |
30 | Lazy Ey Ranch Llp | Marmarth, ND 58643 | $25,477 |
31 | Rocky William Burk | Dickinson, ND 58602 | $25,026 |
32 | Cody David Ruggles | New England, ND 58647 | $24,751 |
33 | Faye Ruggles | New England, ND 58647 | $22,516 |
34 | Susann Powell | Amidon, ND 58620 | $21,332 |
35 | Donald J Nordby | Amidon, ND 58620 | $20,282 |
36 | Mike H Sonsalla | Marmarth, ND 58643 | $19,753 |
37 | Curt Sarsland | Rhame, ND 58651 | $18,783 |
38 | John R Hanson | Bowman, ND 58623 | $17,664 |
39 | Stuart Earl Dilse | Scranton, ND 58653 | $17,621 |
40 | Tom Juntunen | Amidon, ND 58620 | $17,014 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”