Counter Cyclical Program in Slope County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 294
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Slope County, North Dakota totaled $209,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Darwin Ross Germann | Rhame, ND 58651 | $2,090 |
22 | Leroy Wilbert Clendenen | Bowman, ND 58623 | $2,007 |
23 | Michael Charles Teske | Scranton, ND 58653 | $1,939 |
24 | Tim Oberfoell | Bowman, ND 58623 | $1,885 |
25 | Wesley Andrews | Bowman, ND 58623 | $1,867 |
26 | Michael Schneider | Rhame, ND 58651 | $1,866 |
27 | Duane Pope | Bowman, ND 58623 | $1,860 |
28 | J/c Erickson Fam Trst | New England, ND 58647 | $1,737 |
29 | Clayton Phillip Martian | Bowman, ND 58623 | $1,735 |
30 | Teresa Nielsen | New England, ND 58647 | $1,709 |
31 | Stuart Nielsen | New England, ND 58647 | $1,709 |
32 | Wanda Powell | Bowman, ND 58623 | $1,683 |
33 | James R Powell | Bowman, ND 58623 | $1,683 |
34 | Donald Heinrich | Rhame, ND 58651 | $1,660 |
35 | Rettinger Ranch Inc | New England, ND 58647 | $1,624 |
36 | Leon M Hewson | Amidon, ND 58620 | $1,613 |
37 | Joseph William Griffin | Scranton, ND 58653 | $1,594 |
38 | Kory Ruggles | New England, ND 58647 | $1,532 |
39 | Donald J Nordby | Amidon, ND 58620 | $1,503 |
40 | Robert Claude Brooks | Rhame, ND 58651 | $1,449 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”