Deficiency Payment in Slope County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 373
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Slope County, North Dakota totaled $184,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Donald Heinrich | Rhame, ND 58651 | $2,099 |
22 | Gary W Gussey | New England, ND 58647 | $2,068 |
23 | Adam Schulz | New England, ND 58647 | $1,861 |
24 | Keith Hanson | New England, ND 58647 | $1,797 |
25 | Jeff Powell | Amidon, ND 58620 | $1,786 |
26 | Fred E Schaar | Scranton, ND 58653 | $1,730 |
27 | Aaron Hewson | Dickinson, ND 58601 | $1,703 |
28 | Gaylord Heinrich | Rhame, ND 58651 | $1,624 |
29 | John Wolfgram | Rhame, ND 58651 | $1,589 |
30 | Daryle Dennis | Amidon, ND 58620 | $1,574 |
31 | Robert T Folske | Bowman, ND 58623 | $1,559 |
32 | Laverne Teske | Scranton, ND 58653 | $1,533 |
33 | David H Juntunen | Amidon, ND 58620 | $1,521 |
34 | Roberta J Erickson | New England, ND 58647 | $1,513 |
35 | Ernest Bloomgren | Bowman, ND 58623 | $1,505 |
36 | Aber Len Krinke | Rhame, ND 58651 | $1,489 |
37 | Wayne Dennis Narum | Bismarck, ND 58501 | $1,416 |
38 | Robb Duane Pierce | Scranton, ND 58653 | $1,388 |
39 | Ralph Urlacher Estate | New England, ND 58647 | $1,370 |
40 | Steve Weninger | Sentinel Butte, ND 58654 | $1,368 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”