Total Emergency Relief Program in Slope County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 120
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in Slope County, North Dakota totaled $10,150,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Dan Jason Ehlis | Dickinson, ND 58601 | $168,775 |
22 | Scott Olson | New England, ND 58647 | $165,909 |
23 | Michael Olson | New England, ND 58647 | $165,833 |
24 | Susan Elizabeth Powell | Bowman, ND 58623 | $161,467 |
25 | William Scott Gussey | New England, ND 58647 | $159,098 |
26 | Kory Ruggles | New England, ND 58647 | $155,925 |
27 | Dan Powell | Bowman, ND 58623 | $153,705 |
28 | Kevin Jon Thompson | Bowman, ND 58623 | $143,845 |
29 | Leslie Ann Wandler | New England, ND 58647 | $142,733 |
30 | Susann Powell | Amidon, ND 58620 | $137,809 |
31 | Jeff Powell | Amidon, ND 58620 | $136,138 |
32 | Tom J Burke | Bowman, ND 58623 | $133,577 |
33 | Chad Erickson | New England, ND 58647 | $128,116 |
34 | Kenneth Urlacher | New England, ND 58647 | $125,000 |
35 | Janet Ann Ehlis | Bismarck, ND 58504 | $121,047 |
36 | Mary Dennis | Bismarck, ND 58503 | $120,552 |
37 | , | $109,121 | |
38 | Ronald James Ehlis | Bismarck, ND 58504 | $105,258 |
39 | Matt Lambourn | Amidon, ND 58620 | $96,375 |
40 | Daniel Rice Gardner | New England, ND 58647 | $92,921 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”