Farm Subsidy information
Slope County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Slope County, North Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 259
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Slope County, North Dakota totaled $21,638,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Mike H Sonsalla | Marmarth, ND 58643 | $111,207 |
42 | Ronald James Ehlis | Bismarck, ND 58504 | $110,273 |
43 | Holly Marie Brooks | Rhame, ND 58651 | $104,436 |
44 | Chris Bergquist | Rhame, ND 58651 | $102,650 |
45 | Jonathan Jeffers | Rhame, ND 58651 | $102,496 |
46 | Blane Lowell Freitag | Bowman, ND 58623 | $99,994 |
47 | Matthew Burke | Rhame, ND 58651 | $97,568 |
48 | Brandon Flynn | New England, ND 58647 | $97,085 |
49 | Robert Claude Brooks | Rhame, ND 58651 | $91,694 |
50 | Donald J Nordby | Amidon, ND 58620 | $91,407 |
51 | Matt Lambourn | Amidon, ND 58620 | $89,699 |
52 | Clayton Phillip Martian | Bowman, ND 58623 | $89,681 |
53 | Kevin Heinrich | Rhame, ND 58651 | $84,779 |
54 | Ryan Erickson | New England, ND 58647 | $80,287 |
55 | Rob Timm | Rhame, ND 58651 | $78,769 |
56 | Andrew Narum | Bowman, ND 58623 | $74,508 |
57 | Patrick Allen Teske | Scranton, ND 58653 | $73,552 |
58 | Neil Gerbig | Amidon, ND 58620 | $72,588 |
59 | Darwin Ross Germann | Rhame, ND 58651 | $72,048 |
60 | Curt Sarsland | Rhame, ND 58651 | $67,450 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”