Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Slope County, North Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 125
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Slope County, North Dakota totaled $1,814,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Scott Allen Weishaar | Sentinel Butte, ND 58654 | $16,974 |
42 | Eric Bowman | Rhame, ND 58651 | $16,911 |
43 | Frank Buzalsky | Amidon, ND 58620 | $16,686 |
44 | Derrick Thomas Germann | Rhame, ND 58651 | $16,500 |
45 | David, Devon And Faye Burke Partnership | Bowman, ND 58623 | $14,946 |
46 | Matthew Burke | Rhame, ND 58651 | $14,724 |
47 | Scott Bachmeier | Rhame, ND 58651 | $14,642 |
48 | Myron Dean Hewson | New England, ND 58647 | $13,078 |
49 | Gary Miller | Amidon, ND 58620 | $12,258 |
50 | Chad Erickson | New England, ND 58647 | $11,646 |
51 | Wade Alan Bock | New England, ND 58647 | $11,073 |
52 | Kevin Jay Bock | Amidon, ND 58620 | $10,203 |
53 | Scott Preston Ouradnik | Amidon, ND 58620 | $9,933 |
54 | Jeffry Andrew Hewson | New England, ND 58647 | $9,783 |
55 | Donald T Burke | Bowman, ND 58623 | $9,564 |
56 | Wesley Andrews | Bowman, ND 58623 | $9,393 |
57 | Carl Soreide | Bowman, ND 58623 | $9,009 |
58 | Jeanne Kovar Estate | New England, ND 58647 | $8,493 |
59 | Teresa Nielsen | New England, ND 58647 | $8,338 |
60 | Kevin Jon Thompson | Bowman, ND 58623 | $8,124 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”