Production Flexibility Program in Slope County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 558
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Slope County, North Dakota totaled $12,129,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Keith Witte | Regent, ND 58650 | $55,636 |
62 | Daniel Eric Sandvik | South Heart, ND 58655 | $55,539 |
63 | Janet Ann Ehlis | Bismarck, ND 58504 | $54,722 |
64 | Fred E Schaar | Scranton, ND 58653 | $54,645 |
65 | Sheldon Erickson | New England, ND 58647 | $54,043 |
66 | Leroy Wilbert Clendenen | Bowman, ND 58623 | $53,368 |
67 | Roberta J Erickson | New England, ND 58647 | $52,928 |
68 | Gary W Gussey | New England, ND 58647 | $52,921 |
69 | Joseph William Griffin | Scranton, ND 58653 | $52,644 |
70 | Wade Alan Bock | New England, ND 58647 | $52,179 |
71 | Ernest C Holzemer | Amidon, ND 58620 | $50,084 |
72 | Paul Swanson | Bowman, ND 58623 | $48,724 |
73 | Shawn Micheal Pierce | Scranton, ND 58653 | $48,702 |
74 | Kathleen Walsh | Larimore, ND 58251 | $46,748 |
75 | Leroy Wold | Austin, TX 78749 | $46,138 |
76 | Tom Christensen | New England, ND 58647 | $46,034 |
77 | Ryan Erickson | New England, ND 58647 | $45,921 |
78 | Gary Lee Teske | Scranton, ND 58653 | $45,667 |
79 | Ronald D & Dianne J Sorenson-jv | New England, ND 58647 | $45,022 |
80 | Shaun Louis Bergquist | Rhame, ND 58651 | $45,008 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”