Total Commodity Programs in Slope County, North Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 128
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Slope County, North Dakota totaled $1,115,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Eric Bowman | Rhame, ND 58651 | $3,290 |
62 | Jess Schulz | New England, ND 58647 | $3,262 |
63 | John Albert Privratsky | Belfield, ND 58622 | $3,152 |
64 | Sonya Marie Privratsky | Belfield, ND 58622 | $3,152 |
65 | Daniel J Hanson | Mentor, MN 56736 | $3,037 |
66 | Clayton Phillip Martian | Bowman, ND 58623 | $2,981 |
67 | Jaron Reisenauer | Rhame, ND 58651 | $2,954 |
68 | Gordon Olson | New England, ND 58647 | $2,579 |
69 | Leonard Fischer | Amidon, ND 58620 | $2,432 |
70 | Richard L Folske | Bowman, ND 58623 | $2,418 |
71 | Myron Dean Hewson | New England, ND 58647 | $2,358 |
72 | Kurt Heinrich | Bowman, ND 58623 | $2,315 |
73 | Allan Joseph Kohl | New England, ND 58647 | $2,303 |
74 | Matthew Burke | Rhame, ND 58651 | $2,300 |
75 | Tanner Fischer | Bowman, ND 58623 | $2,271 |
76 | Eric Carter Ehlis | Dickinson, ND 58601 | $2,269 |
77 | Elliott Warren Ehlis | New England, ND 58647 | $2,269 |
78 | Dan Jason Ehlis | Dickinson, ND 58601 | $2,269 |
79 | Chase Fairbanks | Amidon, ND 58620 | $2,247 |
80 | Leo Heinrich | Bowman, ND 58623 | $1,998 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”