Farm Subsidy information
Slope County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Slope County, North Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 259
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Slope County, North Dakota totaled $21,638,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Aber Len Krinke | Rhame, ND 58651 | $40,164 |
82 | Shari Ann Krinke | Rhame, ND 58651 | $40,164 |
83 | Donald T Burke | Bowman, ND 58623 | $40,070 |
84 | Gary Miller | Amidon, ND 58620 | $40,055 |
85 | David James Septon | Rhame, ND 58651 | $37,441 |
86 | Robb Michael Narum | Bowman, ND 58623 | $34,051 |
87 | Barbara Jo Narum | Bowman, ND 58623 | $34,051 |
88 | , | $33,707 | |
89 | Shaun Louis Bergquist | Rhame, ND 58651 | $33,514 |
90 | Daniel Rice Gardner | New England, ND 58647 | $33,110 |
91 | Derrick Thomas Germann | Rhame, ND 58651 | $32,668 |
92 | Stonie Hewson | New England, ND 58647 | $31,825 |
93 | Horse Creek Cooperative Grazing Assn | Baker, MT 59313 | $31,542 |
94 | Clint Curtis Grosz | Amidon, ND 58620 | $30,899 |
95 | Jerid Wayne Janikowski | Bowman, ND 58623 | $30,199 |
96 | Wesley Andrews | Bowman, ND 58623 | $28,892 |
97 | Tellan Steffan | Amidon, ND 58620 | $28,805 |
98 | Duane Pope | Bowman, ND 58623 | $28,724 |
99 | Wayne Gerbig | Amidon, ND 58620 | $28,694 |
100 | Michael Charles Teske | Scranton, ND 58653 | $28,290 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”