Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Slope County, North Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 125
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Slope County, North Dakota totaled $283,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Wammen Ranch LLC | Reva, SD 57651 | $421 |
102 | Jb Ranch LLC | Reva, SD 57651 | $421 |
103 | Cletus Edward Miller | Scranton, ND 58653 | $386 |
104 | Clifford Peter Stecher | New England, ND 58647 | $383 |
105 | Darryl Frank | New England, ND 58647 | $368 |
106 | Jason Fischer | Bowman, ND 58623 | $335 |
107 | Kurt Heinrich | Bowman, ND 58623 | $333 |
108 | Tom Christensen | New England, ND 58647 | $269 |
109 | Dora Folske | Bowman, ND 58623 | $251 |
110 | Melvin Schoch | New England, ND 58647 | $235 |
111 | Earl Wayne Ehlers | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $233 |
112 | Ty Nordby | Dickinson, ND 58601 | $214 |
113 | Hannah Nordby | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $214 |
114 | Harley Irving Dubisar | New England, ND 58647 | $201 |
115 | Michael J Dubisar | New England, ND 58647 | $201 |
116 | Kimberly Maychrzak | Bowman, ND 58623 | $201 |
117 | Lawrence Patrick Frank | New England, ND 58647 | $194 |
118 | Evans Bros | New England, ND 58647 | $188 |
119 | Chad Evans | New England, ND 58647 | $139 |
120 | Cody David Ruggles | New England, ND 58647 | $135 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”