Production Flexibility Program in Slope County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 558
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Slope County, North Dakota totaled $12,129,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Bruce Lambourn | Bowman, ND 58623 | $22,639 |
162 | Gene Bergquist | Rhame, ND 58651 | $22,572 |
163 | Henry Herbert Zahn III | New England, ND 58647 | $22,568 |
164 | Howard D Peterson | New England, ND 58647 | $22,334 |
165 | Raymond Heick | West Fargo, ND 58078 | $22,085 |
166 | John Wolfgram | Rhame, ND 58651 | $21,763 |
167 | Daniel Joseph Binstock | New England, ND 58647 | $21,618 |
168 | Melvin Stafford | Scranton, ND 58653 | $21,556 |
169 | Clifford Peter Stecher | New England, ND 58647 | $21,484 |
170 | Clara Overbo Trust | Viroqua, WI 54665 | $21,450 |
171 | Dean Fitterer | New England, ND 58647 | $21,233 |
172 | Pearl Farber | Hermosa, SD 57744 | $21,171 |
173 | Allan Koffler | New England, ND 58647 | $20,964 |
174 | George S Mclaughlin | Bowman, ND 58623 | $20,821 |
175 | Scott Hutzenbiler | Belfield, ND 58622 | $20,415 |
176 | Kurt Heinrich | Bowman, ND 58623 | $20,025 |
177 | Brad Donald Olson | New England, ND 58647 | $19,914 |
178 | James R Parkin | Scranton, ND 58653 | $19,010 |
179 | Doug Pope | Bowman, ND 58623 | $19,005 |
180 | Michael Schneider | Rhame, ND 58651 | $18,816 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”