Production Flexibility Program in Slope County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 181 to 200 of 558
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Slope County, North Dakota totaled $12,129,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
181 | Gordon Olson | New England, ND 58647 | $18,583 |
182 | Leroy Kilwein | New England, ND 58647 | $18,359 |
183 | Duane Wobig | New England, ND 58647 | $18,302 |
184 | Tom Braun | Bowman, ND 58623 | $18,286 |
185 | R C Schumacher Trust | Scottsdale, AZ 85254 | $18,241 |
186 | Shirley Heick | West Fargo, ND 58078 | $18,123 |
187 | Clinton Jacobs | Spearfish, SD 57783 | $18,112 |
188 | Donald Freitag | Bowman, ND 58623 | $18,063 |
189 | Nicalaine Brown | Baker, MT 59313 | $18,012 |
190 | Francis E Dilse Irrev Trust | Scranton, ND 58653 | $17,087 |
191 | Floyd C Pierce Estate | Scranton, ND 58653 | $16,355 |
192 | Stuber Ranch Llp | Bowman, ND 58623 | $16,194 |
193 | Jane Gardner Witman | San Diego, CA 92130 | $16,126 |
194 | Lester Warnke | Scranton, ND 58653 | $16,086 |
195 | H T Enterprises | Dickinson, ND 58601 | $15,902 |
196 | The Hanson Trust | Peoria, AZ 85382 | $15,618 |
197 | David James Septon | Rhame, ND 58651 | $15,360 |
198 | Margery Stafford Test Trust | Scranton, ND 58653 | $15,189 |
199 | Francis E Dilse Estate | Scranton, ND 58653 | $14,941 |
200 | Connie R Lutz | Regent, ND 58650 | $14,854 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”