Wildfires and Hurricane Indemnity Program Payments in Slope County, North Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 85
Recipients of Wildfires and Hurricane Indemnity Program Payments from farms in Slope County, North Dakota totaled $1,265,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Wildfires and Hurricane Indemnity Program Payments 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Teresa Nielsen | New England, ND 58647 | $76,668 |
2 | Stuart Nielsen | New England, ND 58647 | $76,668 |
3 | Janet Ann Ehlis | Bismarck, ND 58504 | $47,765 |
4 | Ronald James Ehlis | Bismarck, ND 58504 | $47,765 |
5 | Eric Carter Ehlis | Dickinson, ND 58601 | $47,763 |
6 | Elliott Warren Ehlis | New England, ND 58647 | $47,763 |
7 | Dan Jason Ehlis | Dickinson, ND 58601 | $47,763 |
8 | Stuart Earl Dilse | Scranton, ND 58653 | $44,642 |
9 | Kathryn Volk Dilse | Scranton, ND 58653 | $44,642 |
10 | Wanda Powell | Bowman, ND 58623 | $39,603 |
11 | James R Powell | Bowman, ND 58623 | $39,603 |
12 | Mary Dennis | Bismarck, ND 58503 | $35,034 |
13 | Dan Powell | Bowman, ND 58623 | $33,672 |
14 | Susan Elizabeth Powell | Bowman, ND 58623 | $33,672 |
15 | Michael Charles Teske | Scranton, ND 58653 | $29,924 |
16 | Thomas Gordon Teske | Scranton, ND 58653 | $29,158 |
17 | Scott Olson | New England, ND 58647 | $25,328 |
18 | Susann Powell | Amidon, ND 58620 | $24,863 |
19 | Jeff Powell | Amidon, ND 58620 | $24,862 |
20 | Kenneth Urlacher | New England, ND 58647 | $22,848 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>