Total Emergency Relief Program in Slope County, North Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 116
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in Slope County, North Dakota totaled $9,821,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Teresa Nielsen | New England, ND 58647 | $425,382 |
2 | Stuart Nielsen | New England, ND 58647 | $402,506 |
3 | Wanda Powell | Bowman, ND 58623 | $396,100 |
4 | James R Powell | Bowman, ND 58623 | $384,078 |
5 | David, Devon And Faye Burke Partnership | Bowman, ND 58623 | $350,171 |
6 | Shannon Craig Stafford | Dickinson, ND 58601 | $334,266 |
7 | Brooks Chalky Butte Ranch | Bowman, ND 58623 | $273,960 |
8 | Sam Juntunen | Amidon, ND 58620 | $273,632 |
9 | Kathryn Volk Dilse | Scranton, ND 58653 | $260,253 |
10 | James Alan Erickson | New England, ND 58647 | $250,000 |
11 | Dean Allan Wandler | New England, ND 58647 | $243,894 |
12 | Stuart Earl Dilse | Scranton, ND 58653 | $242,611 |
13 | Stuber Ranch Llp | Bowman, ND 58623 | $204,457 |
14 | , | $181,197 | |
15 | Kimberly Jean Ruggles | New England, ND 58647 | $179,314 |
16 | Dakota West Farms | New England, ND 58647 | $176,410 |
17 | Ryan Stroh | Bowman, ND 58623 | $171,774 |
18 | Eric Carter Ehlis | Dickinson, ND 58601 | $168,775 |
19 | Elliott Warren Ehlis | New England, ND 58647 | $168,775 |
20 | Dan Jason Ehlis | Dickinson, ND 58601 | $168,775 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>