Total Commodity Programs in Slope County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 854
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Slope County, North Dakota totaled $84,885,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Gary W Gussey | New England, ND 58647 | $374,634 |
62 | Rettinger Ranch Inc | New England, ND 58647 | $373,738 |
63 | Dakota Western Bank ** | Bowman, ND 58623 | $370,177 |
64 | Frank Dilse Estate | Scranton, ND 58653 | $352,392 |
65 | Chad Erickson | New England, ND 58647 | $345,609 |
66 | Stuber Ranch C/o R Stuber | Bowman, ND 58623 | $340,938 |
67 | Dennis Dale Moore | New England, ND 58647 | $337,517 |
68 | Jack Kathrein | Bowman, ND 58623 | $332,180 |
69 | Shawn Micheal Pierce | Scranton, ND 58653 | $331,096 |
70 | Melvin Charles Pierce | Scranton, ND 58653 | $330,658 |
71 | Leon M Hewson | Amidon, ND 58620 | $323,044 |
72 | Ryan Erickson | New England, ND 58647 | $316,104 |
73 | Terry Frank | New England, ND 58647 | $312,523 |
74 | Farrell Lorge | Amidon, ND 58620 | $304,273 |
75 | Jeffry Andrew Hewson | New England, ND 58647 | $302,414 |
76 | American Bank Center ** | Dickinson, ND 58601 | $301,060 |
77 | Barbara Jo Narum | Bowman, ND 58623 | $297,707 |
78 | Clayton Phillip Martian | Bowman, ND 58623 | $297,628 |
79 | Marshall Stafford | Scranton, ND 58653 | $285,608 |
80 | Charles Burk | Bowman, ND 58623 | $284,401 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”