Farm Subsidy information
Steele County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Steele County, North Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 505
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Steele County, North Dakota totaled $41,957,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Bradley Leon Lundstrom | Finley, ND 58230 | $247,824 |
22 | Barry Lee Grotte | Hope, ND 58046 | $244,646 |
23 | Goose River Farms Llp | Northwood, ND 58267 | $243,441 |
24 | Thykeson Farms Inc | Portland, ND 58274 | $232,669 |
25 | Amb Brothers Grain And Feed | Portland, ND 58274 | $224,824 |
26 | Jodi Lynn Carlson | Finley, ND 58230 | $213,066 |
27 | Scott Edward Pfeifer | Finley, ND 58230 | $213,016 |
28 | Matthew James Powell | Hope, ND 58046 | $210,999 |
29 | , | $207,893 | |
30 | Mikayla Jolynn Johnson | Sharon, ND 58277 | $206,842 |
31 | Lucas Dennis Carlson | Finley, ND 58230 | $202,180 |
32 | Jennifer Lynn Bradshaw-johnson | Northwood, ND 58267 | $195,072 |
33 | Jeremy Wayne Johnson | Sharon, ND 58277 | $193,691 |
34 | Christopher Keith Johnson | Northwood, ND 58267 | $191,142 |
35 | Jeremy Carl King | Amenia, ND 58004 | $189,856 |
36 | Randy Jay Ness | Hatton, ND 58240 | $188,622 |
37 | John Elroy Carlson | Finley, ND 58230 | $187,494 |
38 | David Loran Severson | Hope, ND 58046 | $184,348 |
39 | Michael Gene Whitmore | Hope, ND 58046 | $180,872 |
40 | James Clayton Ihry | Hope, ND 58046 | $172,153 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”