Conservation Reserve Program in Steele County, North Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 251
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Steele County, North Dakota totaled $1,311,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Dennis William Carlson | Sharon, ND 58277 | $13,721 |
22 | Christopher Reinhart | Hatton, ND 58240 | $13,238 |
23 | James Duane Ness | Hatton, ND 58240 | $13,049 |
24 | Wendell Jay Gangelhoff | Northwood, ND 58267 | $12,926 |
25 | Dennis Lamarr Braaten | Finley, ND 58230 | $12,894 |
26 | Jeremy Wayne Johnson | Sharon, ND 58277 | $12,726 |
27 | Salander Llp | Hope, ND 58046 | $12,247 |
28 | Roger D Netland | Sharon, ND 58277 | $12,242 |
29 | Carole Annette Pederson | Fargo, ND 58103 | $11,989 |
30 | Janice Anderson | Rochester, MN 55901 | $11,621 |
31 | Larry Kendal Carlson | Finley, ND 58230 | $11,350 |
32 | Mark Kloster Farms Inc | Mayville, ND 58257 | $11,182 |
33 | Karen Marie Ness | Sharon, ND 58277 | $10,769 |
34 | Enger Farms Partnership Llp | Christianted, VI 00824 | $10,604 |
35 | Claire Leon Eberhardt | Aneta, ND 58212 | $10,546 |
36 | Peter Lyle Ness | Sharon, ND 58277 | $10,448 |
37 | Jeffrey Scott Jacobson | Finley, ND 58230 | $10,238 |
38 | Michael Elliott | Clifford, ND 58016 | $10,181 |
39 | Mewes Families Lllp | Hope, ND 58046 | $9,703 |
40 | Robert L Bower | Grand Forks, ND 58201 | $9,690 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”