Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Steele County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 354
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Steele County, North Dakota totaled $29,729,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Clay James Jacobsen | Luverne, ND 58056 | $200,584 |
42 | Don Eugene Goughnour | Finley, ND 58230 | $197,965 |
43 | Matthew James Powell | Hope, ND 58046 | $196,824 |
44 | Gary Conrad Nelson | Luverne, ND 58056 | $194,623 |
45 | Glenn Marvin Jacobson | Finley, ND 58230 | $194,318 |
46 | Peter Lyle Ness | Sharon, ND 58277 | $192,142 |
47 | John Joseph Ihry | Hope, ND 58046 | $191,673 |
48 | Peggy Sue Ihry | Hope, ND 58046 | $191,673 |
49 | Gregory Scott Thykeson | Portland, ND 58274 | $191,309 |
50 | Ross Bradley Thykeson | Hope, ND 58046 | $191,309 |
51 | Donald Jay Satrom | Portland, ND 58274 | $186,422 |
52 | Michael Wayne Steinke | Hope, ND 58046 | $165,978 |
53 | Michael Hilbert Satrom | Galesburg, ND 58035 | $164,212 |
54 | Brad Lundstrom | Finley, ND 58230 | $163,200 |
55 | David Karl Nygaard | Finley, ND 58230 | $162,566 |
56 | James Richard Law | Finley, ND 58230 | $162,136 |
57 | Brian Lee Grandalen | Portland, ND 58274 | $159,049 |
58 | Donald Allen Nygaard | Sharon, ND 58277 | $158,992 |
59 | David Loran Severson | Hope, ND 58046 | $158,334 |
60 | Joshua James Ihry | Hope, ND 58046 | $157,830 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”