Farm Subsidy information
Steele County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Steele County, North Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 562
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Steele County, North Dakota totaled $31,732,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Overland Farm J V | Hope, ND 58046 | $77,823 |
62 | Donald Jay Satrom | Portland, ND 58274 | $76,919 |
63 | David Karl Nygaard | Finley, ND 58230 | $75,586 |
64 | Chasity Juliuson | Hope, ND 58046 | $75,341 |
65 | Jeffrey Alan Juliuson | Hope, ND 58046 | $75,339 |
66 | Erbstoesser Farms Inc | Clifford, ND 58016 | $74,284 |
67 | Brady Michael Palmer | Sharon, ND 58277 | $72,871 |
68 | David Jon Aaland | Hatton, ND 58240 | $72,694 |
69 | Shawn David Palmer | Aneta, ND 58212 | $72,625 |
70 | Keith Lynn Palmer | Sharon, ND 58277 | $72,372 |
71 | Ryan Braaten Farms Inc | Finley, ND 58230 | $72,127 |
72 | Glenn Marvin Jacobson | Finley, ND 58230 | $70,816 |
73 | Brian Lyste | Finley, ND 58230 | $70,400 |
74 | Mewes Farms Inc | Hope, ND 58046 | $69,538 |
75 | Keith Alan Ihry | Hope, ND 58046 | $69,497 |
76 | Brenda Lee Ihry | Hope, ND 58046 | $69,497 |
77 | Aarsvold Farms Inc | Blanchard, ND 58009 | $68,441 |
78 | Peter Lyle Ness | Sharon, ND 58277 | $67,466 |
79 | Christopher James Thompson | Northwood, ND 58267 | $67,360 |
80 | Randy Jay Ness | Hatton, ND 58240 | $66,748 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”