Farm Subsidy information
Steele County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Steele County, North Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 435
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Steele County, North Dakota totaled $20,885,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Dennis William Carlson | Sharon, ND 58277 | $13,721 |
82 | James Duane Ness | Hatton, ND 58240 | $13,710 |
83 | Roger D Netland | Sharon, ND 58277 | $13,486 |
84 | Benjamin Gary Hiam | Hope, ND 58046 | $13,402 |
85 | Peter Lyle Ness | Sharon, ND 58277 | $13,088 |
86 | Dennis Lamarr Braaten | Finley, ND 58230 | $12,894 |
87 | Dennis Bower | Galesburg, ND 58035 | $12,858 |
88 | Scott A Rygg | Portland, ND 58274 | $12,842 |
89 | Bower Family Farm Ltd Partnership | Galesburg, ND 58035 | $12,685 |
90 | Perry James Ostmo | Sharon, ND 58277 | $12,534 |
91 | Aaron Dean Vig | Aneta, ND 58212 | $12,511 |
92 | Agcountry Farm Credit Services ** | Jamestown, ND 58402 | $12,169 |
93 | Jeffrey Scott Jacobson | Finley, ND 58230 | $12,037 |
94 | Carole Annette Pederson | Fargo, ND 58103 | $11,989 |
95 | Peggy Sue Ihry | Hope, ND 58046 | $11,810 |
96 | Michael Elliott | Clifford, ND 58016 | $11,699 |
97 | Sindy Elise Riedman | Portland, ND 58274 | $11,449 |
98 | Richard Orlando Workin | Fargo, ND 58104 | $11,315 |
99 | Bradley Leon Lundstrom | Finley, ND 58230 | $11,254 |
100 | Karen Marie Ness | Sharon, ND 58277 | $11,181 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”