Conservation Reserve Program in Steele County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 863
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Steele County, North Dakota totaled $30,907,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Donald Andrist Dronen | Rochert, MN 56578 | $103,336 |
82 | Thilford Walsvik | Hatton, ND 58240 | $101,885 |
83 | Troy Olson | Cooperstown, ND 58425 | $100,660 |
84 | Janis Eloise Schmitz | Clifford, ND 58016 | $100,174 |
85 | Gerald Harlan Walswick | Finley, ND 58230 | $100,154 |
86 | Orville/lorraine Ness Revoc Trust | Hatton, ND 58240 | $99,586 |
87 | Eugene L Baldwin Living Trust | Hope, ND 58046 | $99,506 |
88 | Eric Branz | Western Springs, IL 60558 | $98,927 |
89 | Randy Jay Ness | Hatton, ND 58240 | $96,989 |
90 | Harold James Zerface | Hope, ND 58046 | $96,497 |
91 | Darwin Leroy Windloss Jr | Sharon, ND 58277 | $96,044 |
92 | Mewes Brothers Partnership | Hope, ND 58046 | $95,624 |
93 | Edward Paulsen Family Trust | Finley, ND 58230 | $95,527 |
94 | Ardell H Klabo | Cooperstown, ND 58425 | $93,091 |
95 | Kloster-williams Partnership | Fargo, ND 58102 | $92,886 |
96 | Thomas Wayne Klabo | Sharon, ND 58277 | $92,468 |
97 | James Marvin Kloster | Mesa, AZ 85206 | $89,698 |
98 | Jon Victor Grotte | Crystal, MN 55428 | $89,095 |
99 | Gary Donald Hiam | Page, ND 58064 | $89,073 |
100 | Charlene Joy Hiam | Page, ND 58064 | $88,731 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”